British court will consider Hindu funeral pyres – UPDATED

The High Court will consider a legal challenge from a 70-year-old Hindu today that would allow him to have an open-air cremation when he dies. The judicial review at the Royal Courts of Justice will hear a case brought by Davender Kumar Ghai, founder of the Anglo-Asian Friendship Society, who wants the law changed to allow traditional Hindu funeral pyres in Britain.
Newcastle City Council has refused him a permit to be cremated in line with Hindu ritual, arguing that a pyre outside a crematorium is prohibited by the 1902 Cremation Act.
Although there have been Hindu cremations in the the past in Britain, in recent years the authorities have become stricter about enforcing the rules. There are more than 600,000 Hindus in Britain and many families pay thousands of pounds to fly the bodies of their loved ones to India for a traditional cremation.
Three years ago the Crown Prosecution Service decided not to prosecute after Mr Ghai organised a funeral pyre in Northumberland for Rajpal Mehat, 31, from India.
Hindus believe that cremation is essential to free the soul from the body after death. The dead person’s oldest son is usually expected to light the fire. Monks and children, having no children of their own, are sometimes buried instead of cremated. The pyre must take place at a site on which the sun shines directly at noon and which is close to running water.
Yup. Let’s expand the precedence of religious law over secular, national law. We followers of the Flying Spaghetti Monster have a few rituals of our own we’d like to introduce – in the States and the U.K.
Or does the number of member of a religion – registered to vote – enter into the equation?
UPDATE: The High Court has ruled against Mr. Ghai’s request.





Generations of Hindus in Britain have found ways to comply with the framework of national rulings in such matters. Why should this individual be any different? I’m not happy seeing public money used to fund such frivolous cases when local schools remain short on staff and resources, fewer bobbies patrol the streets and illegal immigration continues to exert pressure on on a whole gamut of public resources.
Also, why was he not prosecuted previously? Unless there’s been a change of tack recently with Smith’s overhaul of policing, I thought the police were there to uphold the law and prosecute those who openly contravene it?
Learned Fool
March 25, 2009 at 4:26 am
we cannot get a British supermarket in the west end of Newcastle due to ethnic group complaints. So why should we have breaches of British law to facilitate minorities. Britain is no longer Britain.
Mary
April 8, 2009 at 3:30 pm