Eideard

Waggling wings could cut aircraft drag and emissions 20%

with 5 comments

Wings which redirect air to waggle sideways could cut airline fuel bills by 20% according to research funded by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) and Airbus. The new approach, which promises to dramatically reduce mid-flight drag, uses tiny air powered jets which redirect the air, making it flow sideways back and forth over the wing.

The jets work by the Helmholtz resonance principle – when air is forced into a cavity the pressure increases, which forces air out and sucks it back in again, causing an oscillation – the same phenomenon that happens when blowing over a bottle.

Dr Duncan Lockerby, from the University of Warwick, who is leading the project, said: “This has come as a bit of a surprise to all of us in the aerodynamics community. It was discovered, essentially, by waggling a piece of wing from side to side in a wind tunnel.”

“The truth is we’re not exactly sure why this technology reduces drag but with the pressure of climate change we can’t afford to wait around to find out. So we are pushing ahead with prototypes and have a separate three year project to look more carefully at the physics behind it…”

The new micro-jet system being developed by Dr Lockerby and his colleagues could reduce skin friction drag by up to 40%. If successful this technology could also have a major impact on the aerodynamic design and fuel consumptions of cars, boats and trains.

Glad he’s already thinking about cars and trains. It was the first thing that came to mind.

Improving aerodynamics is effective in automobile engineering at surprisingly low speeds. BTW – I don’t care if this makes our four-wheeled friends a bit uglier. Saving money and fuel – and the environment – ain’t ever ugly to me.

About these ads

Written by eideard

May 30, 2009 at 10:00 pm

5 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. This sounds like we’ll all be flying in planes with dorsal surfaces with textures like golf ball dimples.

    I’d be tempted to beat on a test car with a 10-lb. ball peen hammer – if I had a handy wind tunnel.

    moss

    May 30, 2009 at 10:31 pm

  2. I know precious little about this, but does anyone know if there is a reduction in lift?

    wok3

    May 31, 2009 at 2:47 am

  3. I discussed this with a couple of pilots and as long as the “faster” air flow is confined to the upper surface of the wings, lift actually increases with speed.

    moss

    May 31, 2009 at 6:06 am

  4. I’m terribly ignorant of science but this sure sounds like the same principle as the fictional caterpillar drive that silently drove Red October in the movie, The Hunt For Red October.

    Is this life imitating art, except in the air instead of under the water or is it totally different?

    Cinaedh

    May 31, 2009 at 7:15 am


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,090 other followers

%d bloggers like this: