Did you really think Pharmcos respect your privacy?

More than 10 years after she tried without success to have a baby, Marcy Campbell Krinsk is still receiving painful reminders in her mail. The ads and promotions started after she bought fertility drugs at a pharmacy in San Diego.
Marketers got hold of her name, and she found coupons and samples in her mail that shadowed the growth of an imaginary child — at first, for Pampers and baby formula, then for discounts on family photos, and all the way through the years to gifts suitable for an elementary school graduate.
“I had three different in vitro procedures,” said Ms. Krinsk, now 55, a former telecommunications executive who lives with her husband in San Diego. “To just go to the mailbox and get that stuff, time after time after time, it was just awful.”
Like many other people, Ms. Krinsk thought that her prescription information was private. But in fact, prescriptions, and all the information on them — including not only the name and dosage of the drug and the name and address of the doctor, but also the patient’s address and Social Security number — are a commodity bought and sold in a murky marketplace, often without the patients’ knowledge or permission.
That may change if some little-noted protections from the Obama administration are strictly enforced. The federal stimulus law enacted in February prohibits in most cases the sale of personal health information, with a few exceptions for research and public health measures like tracking flu epidemics. It also tightens rules for telling patients when hackers or health care workers have stolen their Social Security numbers or medical information, as happened to Britney Spears, Maria Shriver and Farrah Fawcett before she died in June.

“The new rules will plug some gaping holes in our federal health privacy laws,” said Deven McGraw, a health privacy expert at the nonprofit Center for Democracy and Technology in Washington. “For the first time, pharmacy benefit managers that handle most prescriptions and banks and contractors that process millions of medical claims will be held accountable for complying with federal privacy and security rules.”
The law won’t shut down the medical data mining industry, but there will be more restrictions on using private information without patients’ consent and penalties for civil violations will be increased. Government agencies are still writing new regulations called for in the law…
Selling data to drug manufacturers is still allowed, if patients’ names are removed. But the stimulus law tightens one of the biggest loopholes in the old privacy rules. Pharmacy companies like Walgreens have been able to accept payments from drug makers to mail advice and reminders to customers to take their medications, without obtaining permission. Under the new law, the subsidized marketing is still permitted but it can no longer promote drugs other than those the customer already buys…
Ms. Krinsk in San Diego, whose privacy was repeatedly violated for more than a decade, says she is willing to speak out if it draws attention to the problem. “I’m a pretty tough person,” she said.
Long detailed article. If you resent corporate America’s control of our government – you’ll gain a deeper understanding of why assaults on healthcare reform are the order of the day.
The creeps in Congress who get their re-election funds from the Pharmaceutical and Insurance industries are rallying their Brown Shirts to try every possible tactic to stall and reverse the healthcare programs called for in President Obama’s election campaign. This story reveals more of the pervasive snooping you and your family will continue to face – unless there is a dramatic change.





The health care industry needs to be reformed.
This lady reminds me of the lady in the intro to Idiocracy… Career first… then kids…
Jägermeister
August 9, 2009 at 11:22 am
I always enjoy that video, Jägermeister.
It reminds me even smart humans with two minute attention spans simply cannot grasp the glacial pace of evolution…
…and leaving decisions about reproduction up to females is never going to save the species.
Cinaedh
August 10, 2009 at 7:40 am