Eideard

Little minds aren’t limited to little towns – or little topics

with one comment

A North Dakota newspaper is reviewing its policy against printing same-sex wedding announcements in response to a social media campaign that has drawn international scrutiny.

It took less than 12 hours for the Fargo Forum to address the controversy Monday after the paper’s “celebrations editor” e-mailed Allison Johnson, saying the paper would not publish her wedding announcement. Dianna Baumann also promised to refund the $25 publication fee.

Johnson, 31, channeled her disappointment into a social media campaign that has drawn support from as far as Europe and Australia and sparked a petition on Change.org. By Monday night, the Fargo Forum editor had posted a statement on the paper’s Facebook page saying it was “reviewing its policy about publishing same-sex announcements…”

Johnson and Smith met in Minneapolis six years ago and became a couple in 2008. The proposed wedding announcement described their plan to marry in New York on August 1, followed by a reception on August 4 in Fargo, where Smith was born and raised.

After receiving the rejection e-mail, Johnson took a screen shot of it and shared it with friend and iReporter Gia Rassier, who posted it on Twitter, CNN iReport and Facebook. The image was shared more than 600 times and “spread like wildfire,” Rassier said.

Johnson followed up with an open letter to the Fargo Forum and the mayor of Fargo and shared it on Facebook.

“It is a sad day when two people so in love, about to commit their lives to one another, cannot even engage in the smallest of privileges to honor this union,” she wrote.

“I ask each of you reading this to explain to me WHY, in a city that we call home, where we are days away from becoming homeowners in Fargo, where we support every person that does good for their community, are we excluded from being able to announce our wedding celebration? What makes two women or two men any different from other taxpaying married citizens of Fargo, N.D.?”

I had to choose between a couple of posts I had considered for this spot, tonight. Both dealt with Christian bigots who claim sole possession of “real” Christianity. Now, I know the difference between traditional Rock of Ages Christianity and Bible Belt bigots in charge of the name. As an atheist I leave the task to old-fashioned Christians to sort out this year’s flavor of holy clown show. If you cherish your belief as one of love and succor – than take up the cudgel against cretins and creeps.

Then, this tale wandered into sight – and you know as well as I that the rationales used to justify the Fargo Forum’s slimy policy are going to be something about God’s traditional law. A humbug phoniness which does a disservice to every believer who ever stood up for justice in the face of uncivil law and tradition.

About these ads

Written by Ed Campbell

July 25, 2012 at 2:00 am

One Response

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Reblogged this on Göerger.info and commented:
    Really, Fargo Forum? Really?

    David

    July 25, 2012 at 6:50 pm


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,796 other followers

%d bloggers like this: