Scalia admits to Constitutional limitations of the right to bear arms
“Should we bring back beheading?
Daylife/Getty Images used by permission
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia said Sunday the Constitution allows for limitations to a person’s right to bear arms.
In an interview…Scalia said future cases will have to determine whether the Constitution permits citizens to “keep and bear” semiautomatic weapons or magazines carrying 100 rounds, like those used in the theater shooting in Aurora, Colorado, last week.
“Some [limits] undoubtedly are [permissible], because there were some that were acknowledged at the time” the Constitution was written, he said.
He pointed to a law at the time against what was called afrighting, “which, if you carried around a really horrible weapon just to scare people, like a head ax or something, that was, I believe, a misdemeanor,” Scalia said.
“So yes, there are some limitations that can be imposed. What they are will depend on what the society understood was reasonable limitation,” he added.
Kool Aid Party types are already blowing a gasket. They don’t even comprehend that the law which Bush let expire – with the aid of the usual useless crop of Congressional do-nothings – went through all possible Constitutional challenges from gun nuts when it was passed a couple decades ago.
They do not understand that common law, history and legal precedent affect the Constitution as well as vice versa.