Global Warming debate is no debate at all

with 5 comments

Funny thing happens sometimes when you look at who the witnesses are in a public policy debate . . .

FACT” organizations from Is There a Scientific Consensus on Global Warming?, SkepticalScience.com.“FRAUD” organizations are petitioners v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act.

Click the link in the paragraph above to see the comparison. Barry Ritholtz knocks it out of the park, once again.

About these ads

Written by Ed Campbell

January 18, 2013 at 2:00 am

5 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Reblogged this on Science on the Land.


    January 18, 2013 at 2:35 am

  2. Illustrates the difference between Wall Street Republicans and Tea Party Republicans.


    January 18, 2013 at 6:38 am

    • Well, moderate Wall Street Republicans.


      January 18, 2013 at 6:39 am

  3. You can’t fool me with depicting the earth as a disk. I know it has 4 corners.

    Daniel Digby

    January 18, 2013 at 11:31 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,796 other followers

%d bloggers like this: