Global Warming debate is no debate at all

Funny thing happens sometimes when you look at who the witnesses are in a public policy debate . . .
“FACT” organizations from Is There a Scientific Consensus on Global Warming?, SkepticalScience.com.“FRAUD” organizations are petitioners v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act.
Click the link in the paragraph above to see the comparison. Barry Ritholtz knocks it out of the park, once again.
Written by eideard
January 18, 2013 at 2:00 am
Posted in Business, Economics, Science
Tagged with Barry Ritholtz, Big Picture, climate change, global warming, Science, skeptical flunkies
5 Responses
Subscribe to comments with RSS.






Holler at your Congress-critter to support Bernie Sanders' bill to
Reblogged this on Science on the Land.
argylesock
January 18, 2013 at 2:35 am
Illustrates the difference between Wall Street Republicans and Tea Party Republicans.
god
January 18, 2013 at 6:38 am
Well, moderate Wall Street Republicans.
god
January 18, 2013 at 6:39 am
You can’t fool me with depicting the earth as a disk. I know it has 4 corners.
Daniel Digby
January 18, 2013 at 11:31 am
Har.
moss
January 18, 2013 at 1:48 pm