Honest rating agency punished for telling the truth – the Big 3 frauds carry on as usual

The big 3 government backed ratings agencies (technically known as Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization) – S&P, Moody’s and Fitch – all committed massive fraud, which was a prime cause of the 2008 economic crash.
They took bribes for higher ratings, “sold their soul“, engaged in a “culture of covering up improper ratings“, and said that anyone who believed them was an idiot…
They also played games to avoid downgrading U.S. credit. Basically, they scratched the government’s back, so the government scratched their back.
On the other hand, government-backed rating agency Egan-Jones has consistently been more honest and forthright in its ratings of countries and corporations, and more aggressive than Moody’s or S&P in downgrading U.S. credit (and see this).
So guess which rating agency just got stripped for a year and a half of its government-backed rating agency status?
Yup … Egan-Jones.
Given that the government’s whole strategy in dealing with the financial crisis is to cover up the fraud (the “financial reform” legislation didn’t do anything much to reform rating agency shenanigans), honesty cannot go unpunished.
I brought up the attempt to slap down Egan-Jones for truth-telling a few months back. Bill Cohan wrote a great piece about this crap over at Bloomberg News. This article by Barry Ritholtz shows the world the result of playing fair with Wall Street and the Washington Wizards.
Written by eideard
January 25, 2013 at 8:00 am
Posted in Business, Crime, Politics
Tagged with Barry Ritholtz, corrupt, credit ratings, Egan-Jones, flunky, Great Recession, S.E.C., Sean Egan, The Big Picture, Wall Street
3 Responses
Subscribe to comments with RSS.






Holler at your Congress-critter to support Bernie Sanders' bill to
I wonder what Egan’s assessment of mortgage backed securities was in 2007? That would be telling.
J. Palmer
January 25, 2013 at 8:43 am
They were just becoming recognized by the Feds In 2007 – didn’t get into MBS. But, they have always made their nut from subscribers rather than the securities they rate providing a subsidy.
eideard
January 25, 2013 at 9:31 am
That makes sense. Thanks, E.
J. Palmer
January 25, 2013 at 9:59 am