Social Security is a model for Washington budgetmaking — Congress is the failure!

Every day in the United States, 10,000 baby boomers reach retirement age. That, in a nutshell, is the demographic challenge facing Social Security.

Critics want to blame the system itself. They point out how it will run through its surplus funds by 2033 – and how, after that, it will only have enough to provide 75 percent of promised benefits. They depict Social Security as one more failed government program or, as Texas Gov. Rick Perry once put it, a Ponzi scheme.

But compared with Washington’s budget processes, Social Security is a model of fiscal rectitude. While Congress has failed to rein in spending and engaged in expensive off-budget wars at the same time that it was cutting taxes for the rich, Social Security has operated under a 30-year bipartisan agreement that not only fully funded existing benefits but also built up a $2.6 trillion surplus in anticipation of today’s retiree bulge.

How has Washington rewarded that fiscal prudence? Congress and various administrations have raided these surplus monies in order to make their overspending appear less egregious in the budget books.

So next time someone suggests radically downsizing Social Security or scrapping it altogether, ask yourself who should take the bigger financial hit: baby boomers and younger workers who paid into the system to build up the surplus – or the top 1 percent of Americans who benefited the most from all those tax cuts..?

It’s true that Social Security’s 30-year-old compromise was not a permanent solution. Social Security has historically been a pay-as-you-go system: the FICA amounts paid by workers and their employers exceeded the payments from Social Security for benefits for current retirees. That changed in 2010 when the Social Security Administration had to begin using the interest accumulated on the excess amounts paid into the system over the past 30 years to make up the difference between receipts and benefits.

SSA estimates that this interest along with Social Security taxes collected annually will be sufficient to fund benefits through 2020. After 2020, SSA must begin drawing on the $2.6 trillion in the trust fund by liquidating enough US Treasury bonds to make up the difference. The shortfall in monies for future retirees’ benefits, referred to as an “entitlement problem,” must come from somewhere.

The CSM wanders off into three choices. RTFA. Truly, the most just would be taking something back from the 1% who have been riding the gravy train all these years. Between Republican intransigence and spineless Democrats I don’t think that’s likely, yet. Though it’s worth the good fight.

Simply removing the cap, continuing to collect the FICA tax from folks’ earnings after they exceed $106K in gross income will get us into the 22nd Century. Surely there will be a few people with brains and courage in Congress by then.

D’ya think?

About these ads

3 comments

  1. Joe D

    Might have worked if every Company did not stop paying pensions, thank the Unions for Pensions for wha is left is because of Unions. Pols on both side of the aisle need a spanking on the SSA Come to America then sponsor your Elderly parents or grandparents to move to America, pay for them for two years and then they get SSI payments, happened in my Home town where we got a flood of Refusniks from Russia former Communists who wanted to move to America and we are paying for them Never a penny into the System but live off their SSI Check

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s