Nasa is facing an extraordinary backlash from US researchers after it emerged that the space agency has banned Chinese scientists, including those working at US institutions, from a conference on grounds of national security.
NASA officials rejected applications from Chinese nationals who hoped to attend the meeting at the agency’s Ames research centre in California next month citing a law, passed in March, which prohibits anyone from China setting foot in a NASA building.
The law is part of a broad and aggressive move initiated by congressman Frank Wolf, chair of the House appropriations committee, which has jurisdiction over NASA. It aims to restrict the foreign nationals’ access to NASA facilities, ostensibly to counter espionage.
But the ban has angered many US scientists who say Chinese students and researchers in their labs are being discriminated against. A growing number of US scientists have now decided to boycott the meeting in protest, with senior academics withdrawing individually, or pulling out their entire research groups.
The conference is being held for US and international teams who work on NASA’s Kepler space telescope programme, which has been searching the cosmos for signs of planets beyond our solar system. The meeting is the most important event in the academic calendar for scientists who specialise in the field…
Geoff Marcy, an astronomy professor at the University of California, Berkeley, who has been tipped to win a Nobel prize for his pioneering work on exoplanets, or planets outside the solar system, called the ban “completely shameful and unethical”.
In an email sent to the conference organisers, Marcy said: “In good conscience, I cannot attend a meeting that discriminates in this way. The meeting is about planets located trillions of miles away, with no national security implications,” he wrote.
“It is completely unethical for the United States of America to exclude certain countries from pure science research,” Marcy told the Guardian. “It’s an ethical breach that is unacceptable. You have to draw the line…”
Gasp – you posted a drawing of the space telescope. Congress will have a wedgie!
Chinese applicants were told they could not attend the conference in an email sent by Mark Messersmith, a Kepler project specialist at NASA Ames. “Unfortunately … federal legislation passed last March forbids us from hosting any citizens of the People’s Republic of China at a conference held at facilities of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Regarding those who are already working at other institutions in the US, due to security issues resulting from recent Congressional actions, they are under the same constraints,” according to the email, seen by the Guardian.
The recent Congressional action refers to a broader law passed in July which prohibits NASA funds from being used to participate or collaborate with China in any way. The law has raised fears among some NASA-funded scientists that they will have to sever ties with their Chinese collaborators, and no longer take on Chinese students…
Sir Martin Rees, Britain’s astronomer royal, said he “fully supported” Marcy’s position and called the ban “a deplorable ‘own goal’ by the US”.
Chris Lintott, an astronomer at Oxford University, called for a total boycott of the conference until the situation had been resolved. “I’m shocked and upset by the way this policy has been applied. Science is supposed to be open to all and restricting those who can attend by nationality goes against years of practice, going right back to cold war conferences of Russian and western physicists,” he said. “The Kepler team should move their conference somewhere else – and I hope everyone boycotts until they do.”
Let us remember this may have been a pet project of the right-wing pricks who infest Congress; but, it didn’t get passed into law without liberal and moderate politicians rolling over and playing dead. It didn’t become law until it was signed by the guy in the White House.
Trembling in the face of racism and master race Cold Warriors is not an acceptable excuse. It serves only as a description of the level of cowardice present among our elected officials.