Golden Gate Bridge directors vote for net to catch suicides

Golden Gate Bridge directors have voted decisively to try to stop people from jumping to their deaths from the landmark bridge by hanging nets along the sides of the span.

The Board of Directors voted 14-to-1 to install the stainless-steel net system, which would be placed 20 feet below the deck, and would collapse around anyone who jumped into it, making it difficult, if not impossible, for anyone to leap to their death. The lone “no” vote came from Director James Eddie of Mendocino County, who said his constituents did not consider a barrier necessary.

An audience of about 50 people, including psychiatrists, suicide prevention experts and family members of people who had jumped to their deaths from the bridge, applauded the decision. Some had fought for decades for a suicide barrier…

But it probably will be years before the 3.4 miles of netting are installed, said Mary Currie, bridge district spokeswoman. Before it can start construction, the bridge district must complete more studies, including one on the effects of the net on birds, and come up with a funding plan. Then it would need to complete engineering and design work, and hire a contractor.

“Our next big challenge is to come up with the money,” she said.

Let ’em jump. Send the bill for recovery to their insurance beneficiary.

4 thoughts on “Golden Gate Bridge directors vote for net to catch suicides

  1. moss says:

    Sounds like the same cost-accounting the Pentagon is best known for. A quick Google infer there are 35-75 suicides/year off the bridge. Supposed it was 100?

    At $40 million minimum, it would 400,000 years to bring the curves together. Society is better served spending the money on maintenance – and let people kill themselves when they wish to, where and how they wish to.

    They ain’t falling on a crowd in a ballpark are they?

  2. james357 says:

    If those people think a body dropped from that height just looks wet and peaceful, I’m guessing they’re wrong. What ever happened to booze and pills?

  3. K B says:

    This is one of the dumbest expenditures I have ever seen. They should nickname it the Nanny Net.

    At heart I have some strong libertarian leanings.

  4. David says:

    It makes no sense to me, I don’t understand what good they think the net will do? Are they trying to save the cost of body pickup? It most certainly will not prevent any suicides, not one. It’s a waste of money! I agree that people should be allowed to jump if they want to.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.