Conservatives set out to repeal California execution law they passed in 1978 — the biggest mistake of their lives

The year was 1978, and the California ballot bristled with initiatives for everything from banning gay teachers to cracking down on indoor smoking. Both lost. But one, Proposition 7, sailed through: expanding the state’s death penalty law to make it among the toughest and most far-reaching in the country.

The campaign was run by Ron Briggs, today a farmer and Republican member of the El Dorado County Board of Supervisors. It was championed by his father, John V. Briggs, a state senator. And it was written by Donald J. Heller, a former prosecutor in the New York district attorney’s office who had moved to Sacramento.

Thirty-four years later, another initiative is going on the California ballot, this time to repeal the death penalty and replace it with mandatory life without parole. And two of its biggest advocates are Ron Briggs and Mr. Heller, who are trying to reverse what they have come to view as one of the biggest mistakes of their lives…

“At the time, we were of the impression that it would do swift justice, that it would get the criminals and murderers through the system quickly and apply them the death penalty,” Mr. Briggs, 54, said over tea in the kitchen at his 100-acre farm in this Gold Rush town, where he grows potatoes, peppers, melons, watermelons, cherries and (unsuccessfully, so far) black Périgord truffles.

“But it’s not working,” he said. “My dad always says, admit the obvious. We started with 300 on death row when we did Prop 7, and we now have over 720 — and it’s cost us $4 billion. I tell my Republican friends, ‘Close your eyes for a moment. If there was a state program that was costing $185 million a year and only gave the money to lawyers and criminals, what would you do with it..?’ ”

Try that out on the nutballs now in charge of the Republican Party.

It’s been a colossal failure,” Mr. Heller said in his Sacramento office. “The cost of our system of capital punishment is so enormous that any benefit that could be obtained from it — and now I think there’s very little or zero benefit — is so dollar-wasteful that it serves no effective purpose…”

A report last year found that California was spending $184 million a year on a cottage industry of lawyers, expert witnesses and supersecure prisons to deal with the death row population created by Proposition 7.

“The cost is the most politically neutral argument,” said Paula M. Mitchell, a Loyola Law School professor and one of the authors of the report. “We’ve debated the morality of the death penalty for decades. We’ve tried very hard to focus on the objective cost issue, because that’s something that people who differ on all the other issues can reach a consensus on…”

When he wrote the initiative, Mr. Heller said, he gave no thought to its cost. “I am convinced now that it has never deterred anyone from committing a murder,” he said. “In my mind, I realized what I did was a big mistake.”


I’m as likely as any Old Testament nutball to savor the concept of revenge as a component of justice. But, reality may as well play a part in our legal structure once in a while.

Just as warehousing violent criminals makes sense while incarcerating some kid caught smoking a joint is as stupid as jurisprudence can be, the foolishness of spending several times more than the cost of a life sentence with no opportunity for parole, pardon or commutation for the “morality” of a death sentence offends every intellectual and fiscal sensibility.

3 thoughts on “Conservatives set out to repeal California execution law they passed in 1978 — the biggest mistake of their lives

  1. drugsandotherthings says:

    Living there- I have little hope this will pass.

    People have this false belief that death row inmates get endless appeals and are overly coddled. The truth is much different- even with evidence of innocence one can still be sent to death if a reasonable jury would have found the person guilty with the evidence available at the time of the original trial.

    And the situation is especially bad in CA, where after the 1986 voter removal of Rose Birdfrom the state supreme court for overturning a death sentence no CA Appeals Court or Supreme Court has overturned a sentence.

    And there is plenty of evidence to support repealing it- it is not an effective deterrent, it doesn’t provide closure for most victims families, it is unevenly applied, DNA and other new techniques have freed a not insignificant number of prisoners wrongly convicted- increasing the evidence that we have likely already executed innocent people…

    I previously covered some of the Alice in Wonderland aspects of the death penalty in a blog post here:

  2. L.Q. says:

    This Wednesday, Texas put Barney Fuller to death, bringing an end to the state’s record-setting six-month streak without an execution.
    The state of Texas is the number one executioner of death row inmates in the United States, a distinction rooted in the state’s very legal framework. Jurors in Texas are not permitted to consider mitigating evidence during the sentencing phase of a trial and there is no public defender system in Texas for indigent defendants, also Texas does not appoint but instead elects its appellate judges, thereby rewarding tough judicial policies.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s