The 1-percent’s solution

Economic debates rarely end with a T.K.O. But the great policy debate of recent years between Keynesians, who advocate sustaining and, indeed, increasing government spending in a depression, and austerians, who demand immediate spending cuts, comes close — at least in the world of ideas. At this point, the austerian position has imploded; not only have its predictions about the real world failed completely, but the academic research invoked to support that position has turned out to be riddled with errors, omissions and dubious statistics.

Yet two big questions remain. First, how did austerity doctrine become so influential in the first place? Second, will policy change at all now that crucial austerian claims have become fodder for late-night comics?

On the first question: the dominance of austerians in influential circles should disturb anyone who likes to believe that policy is based on, or even strongly influenced by, actual evidence. After all, the two main studies providing the alleged intellectual justification for austerity — Alberto Alesina and Silvia Ardagna on “expansionary austerity” and Carmen Reinhart and Kenneth Rogoff on the dangerous debt “threshold” at 90 percent of G.D.P. — faced withering criticism almost as soon as they came out.

And the studies did not hold up under scrutiny…Yet austerity maintained and even strengthened its grip on elite opinion. Why?

Part of the answer surely lies in the widespread desire to see economics as a morality play, to make it a tale of excess and its consequences. We lived beyond our means, the story goes, and now we’re paying the inevitable price. Economists can explain ad nauseam that this is wrong…No matter; many people have a visceral sense that we sinned and must seek redemption through suffering — and neither economic argument nor the observation that the people now suffering aren’t at all the same people who sinned during the bubble years makes much of a dent.

But it’s not just a matter of emotion versus logic. You can’t understand the influence of austerity doctrine without talking about class and inequality…

Class denied by that useless standard of America’s historic horseshit. The so-called Protestant ethic.

Thus, the average American is somewhat worried about budget deficits, which is no surprise given the constant barrage of deficit scare stories in the news media, but the wealthy, by a large majority, regard deficits as the most important problem we face. And how should the budget deficit be brought down? The wealthy favor cutting federal spending on health care and Social Security — that is, “entitlements” — while the public at large actually wants to see spending on those programs rise.

You get the idea: The austerity agenda looks a lot like a simple expression of upper-class preferences, wrapped in a facade of academic rigor. What the top 1 percent wants becomes what economic science says we must do…

And this makes one wonder how much difference the intellectual collapse of the austerian position will actually make. To the extent that we have policy of the 1 percent, by the 1 percent, for the 1 percent, won’t we just see new justifications for the same old policies?

I hope not; I’d like to believe that ideas and evidence matter, at least a bit. Otherwise, what am I doing with my life? But I guess we’ll see just how much cynicism is justified.

I’ve never claimed to be less of a cynic than Paul Krugman. I’m not about to start. I learned my lesson well with every war our politicians felt to be holy and just in the past half-century.

That doesn’t mean it isn’t worth fighting the good fight. Some issues have overcome. Civil rights for Black Americans is in place and about to gradually slide into place for the Gay Community. A flock of acknowledgements of women’s rights have become law.

True, these all are under constant attack from religious fools and those who share that special ignorance. But, there are battalions of enlightened Americans ready and willing to keep those advances in place – and expand them. Confidence is justifiable even if it relies to some extent on generational inertia.

One thought on “The 1-percent’s solution

  1. MasterMind secret of Law of Attraction says:

    Yes .. the 99% is free to follow in the footsteps of the 1% … so what steps them … general apathy … not being guided correctly when they are young in any religion so that as adults they look on the world as one full of hope. Philosophy is subject that must be introduced into schools or a younger age .. so that people are prepared to handle the reality of the real worlds.
    I can tell you that where I stand … I create my world with choice .. where I experience nothing of any bad that goes on simply because I have taken myself out of this equation by choice. We all live in parallel words for each one a different one as to his choice. If all this is taught to children at a younger age they would be better equipped to handle life. Its a spiritual world more than a religious world.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.