Heritage study co-author wants immigrants judged by ethnic IQ

The Heritage Foundation made something of a splash with its study suggesting that immigration reform will cost the public trillions. Past work by one of its co-authors helps put that piece in context.

Jason Richwine is relatively new to the think tank world. He received his PhD in public policy from Harvard in 2009, and joined Heritage after a brief stay at the American Enterprise Institute. Richwine’s doctoral dissertation is titled “IQ and Immigration Policy”; the contents are well summarized in the dissertation abstract:

The statistical construct known as IQ can reliably estimate general mental ability, or intelligence. The average IQ of immigrants in the United States is substantially lower than that of the white native population, and the difference is likely to persist over several generations. The consequences are a lack of socioeconomic assimilation among low-IQ immigrant groups, more underclass behavior, less social trust, and an increase in the proportion of unskilled workers in the American labor market. Selecting high-IQ immigrants would ameliorate these problems in the U.S., while at the same time benefiting smart potential immigrants who lack educational access in their home countries.

Richwine’s dissertation asserts that there are deep-set differentials in intelligence between races. While it’s clear he thinks it is partly due to genetics — “the totality of the evidence suggests a genetic component to group differences in IQ” — he argues the most important thing is that the differences in group IQs are persistent, for whatever reason. He writes, “No one knows whether Hispanics will ever reach IQ parity with whites, but the prediction that new Hispanic immigrants will have low-IQ children and grandchildren is difficult to argue against…”

He adds more blah, blah, blah about the skills required of high-tech industry and why this is more important than the low-tech skills agribusiness already is in the habit of hiring – but, that’s OK – it fits the ideology of the Heritage Foundation. Of course.

This junk science rationale for racism has infected rightwing ideology from 1920’s Germany right on through America Firsters to today’s birthers and Confederacy revivalists. Apologists at the Heritage Foundation say that Richwine’s bigotry had no effect on the tract they just produced to muster opposition to immigration reform. I guess it’s just the incidental racism that’s part of all Republican politics, nowadays.

2 thoughts on “Heritage study co-author wants immigrants judged by ethnic IQ

  1. kholli says:

    I have no idea how this idiot could have graduated Harvard with a dissertation that makes such unscientific claims. The IQ test is largely rejected by scientists as a measure of intelligence and his interpretation of statistics on IQ, incarceration rates, etc. is in violation of scientific ethics. I don’t know what public policy graduate programs are like, but I promise you this crap would never meet muster in a sociology program.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.