The US has little credibility – Syria won’t change that

Same as it ever was

Much of the contemporary turmoil in the Middle East owes its origins to foreign powers drawing lines in the sand that were both arbitrary and consequential and guided more by their imperial standing than the interests of the region. The “red line” that president Barack Obama has set out as the trigger for US military intervention in Syria is no different.

He drew it unilaterally in August 2012 in response to a question about “whether [he envisioned] using US military” in Syria. “A red line for us is we start seeing a whole bunch of chemical weapons moving around or being utilised. That would change my calculus. That would change my equation.”

On 21 August there was a chemical weapons attack outside Damascus believed to have been carried out by the Syrian government. That changed both Obama’s calculus and his memory. “I didn’t set a red line,” he claimed last week. I didn’t draw it, he insisted, everybody did. “The world set a red line”.

This was news to the world, which, over the weekend, sought to distance itself from his line, as the US president doubled-down on his double-speak…

The alleged urgency to bomb Syria at this moment is being driven almost entirely by the White House’s desire to assert both American power and moral authority as defined by a self-imposed ultimatum. It is to this beat that the drums of war are pounding. But thus far few are marching. The American public is against it by wide margins. As a result it is not clear that Congress, whose approval he has sought, will back him. The justification and the objectives for bombing keep changing and are unconvincing. He has written a rhetorical cheque his polity may not cash and the public is reluctant to honour. On Tuesday night he’ll make his case to a sceptical nation from the White House…

…The insistence that a durable and effective solution to this crisis lies at the end of an American cruise missile beggars belief. It is borne from the circular sophistry that has guided most recent “humanitarian interventions”: (1) Something must be done now; (2) Bombing is something; (3) Therefore we must bomb…

The problem for America in all of this is that its capacity to impact diplomatic negotiations is limited by the fact that its record of asserting its military power stands squarely at odds with its pretensions of moral authority. For all America’s condemnations of chemical weapons, the people of Falluja in Iraq are experiencing the birth defects and deformities in children and increases in early-life cancer that may be linked to the use of depleted uranium during the US bombardment of the town. It also used white phosphorus against combatants in Falluja.

Its chief ally in the region, Israel, holds the record for ignoring UN resolutions, and the US is not a participant in the international criminal court – which is charged with bringing perpetrators of war crimes to justice – because it refuses to allow its own citizens to be charged. On the very day Obama lectured the world on international norms he launched a drone strike in Yemen that killed six people.

Obama appealing for the Syrian regime to be brought to heel under international law is a bit like Tony Soprano asking the courts for a restraining order against one of his mob rivals – it cannot be taken seriously because the very laws he is invoking are laws he openly flouts.

Since the end of World War 2 – and the way we ended it – the United States has ignored international law, treaties and the worldwide expansion of a struggle for human rights that happened in parallel with anti-colonialism. Our nation supported any and all colonial powers that weren’t smart enough to withdraw gracefully. We volunteered the lives of our military personnel in a foolhardy quest to shut down efforts to shrug off the imperial yoke of Western corporate power – all the way to VietNam.

We lost every one of those battles more often sooner than later; but, we lost them all. Obama believes like all self-deluded American politicians he still can find some means of reintroducing that control. Most recently by technological means – as ignorant as ever of the fact that knowing which people would prefer to get your foot off their neck doesn’t mean they will stop threatening to break that foot if you don’t remove it. Declaring the rest of the world to be led by religious terrorists – from atop a pyramid of dollars worshipped by our own religious terrorists – changes nothing. And never reinstates credibility lost over decades.

3 thoughts on “The US has little credibility – Syria won’t change that

  1. drugsandotherthings says:

    Actually- I would argue Obama is far more in the right now then he was in that statement.

    While there have been a number of moments that have forced me to think about my beliefs over the years, one of the most relevant in this case: Rwanda. No threat to US interests. No US interests at all really. Except the very moral foundation we claim to stand upon. Same as Syria, No real US interests in play at all; and many actually against our interests (Assad actually has a long history of supporting/protecting christians in a largely muslim country). Arguably the only US interest at play is the chemical weapons issue.

    (to be fair- I do indeed feel that if the US takes action now it will be, per usual, largely for the wrong reasons. I feel we should have become involved the instant they chose to routinely slaughter their own people)

    I watched (and was part of) the “left” that cheered the “Arab Spring”. The great hope and potential there. The people who were willing to stand up- really stand up, for the very things americans love to claim they support but refuse to actually stand up for. And I watched as Kent State or Tianemen Square was repeated- over, and over, and over. And was buyoed by the Syrian military forces who defected- refusing to fire on their own citizens. And disgusted by the silence from my fellow americans. Because they were arabs. Because our interests didn’t come into play. Because we weren’t threatened.

    For all the horrors of the wars, dirty little wars, coups and dictators we either supported or chose to turn a blind eye to our covernments covert support of, I can only think of Bosnia where we actually did good. And a few attemts, such as Somalia, where we cut and ran when things turned rough.

    I always thought America was worth saving. That it could change. But I increasingly no longer think so. We are selfish. We only care about what we can get from a situation. And for all our flowery words, and our chest thumping- we really just don’t give a damn about anything but ourselves.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.