China and the US have unveiled new pledges on greenhouse gas emissions, as the leaders of the two countries met for talks in Beijing.
US President Barack Obama said the move was “historic”, as he set a new goal of reducing US levels between 26%-28% by 2025, compared with 2005 levels.
China did not set a specific target, but said emissions would peak by 2030.
China has cut carbon intensity for nine years in a row.
The two countries also agreed to reduce the possibility of military accidents in the air and sea…
In case you didn’t notice, only one of those two countries is stacking up military forces in air and on the sea – next to the other.
The two countries together produce about 45% of the world’s carbon dioxide…
President Obama’s offer is based on cuts in carbon emissions from coal power (a policy the Republicans threaten to reverse).
China’s offer to peak emissions is a long-awaited decision. Its emissions trajectory is now similar to Europe and the USA, just further behind because it still has so many people in poverty.
Scientists will fear this agreement is not yet strong enough. But it does show leadership – and it sends a powerful signal to financiers that investing in dirty fuels for the future is becoming a risk.
Except, not for the next two years at least. The Party of NO is now in a position to try to turn back what little has been done.
In September, China told a United Nations summit on climate change that it would soon set a peak for carbon emissions and that it would make its economy more carbon efficient by 2020.
China had previously aimed to reduce its carbon intensity, which meant reducing the amount of emissions per dollar of economic output. This meant that with its rapidly growing economy, its emissions could still rise.
Wednesday’s pledge is the first time it has agreed to set a ceiling, albeit an undefined one, on overall emissions.
China can speak for themselves and their actions speak much louder than editorial content in the NY TIMES. As an American citizen, I’m concerned with what my nation does – or in the case of any political topic requiring commitment at least 6th grade science, what my nation does not do.
Americans aren’t educated. Our politicians reject education and science – aside from lip service. As the recent mid-terms proved, our nation not only does not vote in their own self-interest, they don’t vote.
I think my cynicism is justified.