Koch Bros flunky opposes more national parks


…Throughout the national park system, an enormous backlog of deferred maintenance is eroding the visitor experience and threatening the very resources that the National Park Service was created to protect. Earlier this year, the park service announced that the cost of deferred maintenance had reached $11.5 billion…

Despite this, in December President Obama effectively spread the maintenance budget even thinner by adding seven new parks totaling approximately 120,000 acres to the park system. The administration also supports reauthorizing the Land and Water Conservation Fund, which devotes up to $900 million annually from offshore oil and gas leases to federal land acquisitions and state recreational grants — but nothing explicitly for the maintenance of our federal lands.

Adding more land to the federal estate is irresponsible when the government is failing to maintain the parks, forests and grazing lands it currently owns. Rather than using the conservation fund to acquire more land, Congress should use the money to help address the deferred maintenance backlog.

True conservation is taking care of the land and water you already have, not insatiably acquiring more and hoping it manages itself.

Advocates for reauthorizing the conservation fund, including the Interior Department, point to broad public support for public land acquisition, particularly for private holdings within park boundaries and other ecologically sensitive parcels threatened by development. However, federal land agencies can acquire these priority parcels in a revenue-neutral manner by swapping them with other federal lands, leaving the land and water conservation money for critical maintenance and repairs.

Reed Watson, the executive director at the Koch-backed Property and Environment Research Center blthers on with sophistry for a spell – then, gets to his point:

First, Congress should stop acquiring more land and use the Land and Water Conservation Fund to help pay down the deferred maintenance backlog. Second, Congress should renew and expand the authority of federal land agencies that oversee our parks, forests and rangelands to charge user fees and allow those fees to be used at the locations where they were collected.

No thought given to reordering priorities on how our government spends its whole budget.

The Park Service budget for fiscal year 2015 is $2.6 billion – less than 1/10th of 1% of the federal budget. At the same time all of the regular activities of the Department of Defense are projected to consume 54% of all federal discretionary spending, or $598.5 billion out of a total of $1.1 trillion.

Might we consider withdrawing the taxpayer subsidies in the billion$ we hand over to fossil fuel companies? Nope, flunkies like Watson spend their lobbying time before Congress and the public prating about more efficient use of the pittance set aside for nature’s natural heritage in the United States. In the heart of hearts of creeps like the Koch Bros, there is nothing they’d like better than ignoring real conservation – until after they’ve sucked every bit of carbon from the ground and stuffed it into the air we breathe.

7 thoughts on “Koch Bros flunky opposes more national parks

  1. Meanwhile says:

    “Pentagon budget 2016 draws veto threats, Democratic opposition” http://www.janes.com/article/52896/pentagon-budget-2016-draws-veto-threats-democratic-opposition “President Barack Obama has threatened to veto defence bills that use supplemental accounts to add funding for defence while allowing domestic programmes to be capped, as Democrats continue to push for a compromise to raise overall budget limits.
    A Republican-led effort in the fiscal year 2016 (FY 2016) defence bills seeks to obviate funding limits – mandated by the 2011 Budget Control Act – by adding as much as USD89.2 billion to the non-capped Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) account, for USD611.9 billion in total national defence funding. In FY 2016 sequestration caps the total national defence budget at USD523 billion.” (see chart if the total US defence budget projected before and after the 2011 Budget Control Act and its sequestration mechanism. (IHS)

    • Update says:

      “Experts predict US FY 2016 defence budget deal in December” http://www.janes.com/article/53053/analysis-experts-predict-us-fy-2016-defence-budget-deal-in-december “US budget experts expect that Congress and the White House will be unable to achieve a ‘grand bargain’ to undo the 2011 Budget Control Act (BCA) and its funding limits, but that a shorter-term solution is likely by late this year. ANALYSIS: The defence appropriations bills are still being finalised and the House and Senate are, as of this writing, working to reconcile their respective versions of the authorisation bill during a ‘conference’ committee. IHS Jane’s understands that the authorisation bill’s conference report could be finished within the next week.
      President Barack Obama has threatened to veto those bills if they use uncapped Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) accounts to add defence funding without also adding domestic funding or new revenues.”

  2. Wonmug says:

    Within the boundaries of the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument in southern Utah are the fossilized remains of 21 dinosaurs never seen before, as well as six crocodile species and 17 turtle species. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/21/science/utah-grand-staircase-dinosaurs-kaiparowits-plateau-fossils.html “…In the past 15 years, Dr. Titus and his colleagues at the Bureau of Land Management — along with the Natural History Museum of Utah, the Denver Museum of Nature & Science and hundreds of volunteers, interns and researchers — have excavated tens of thousands of fossils from an extraordinary part of the Grand Staircase monument called the Kaiparowits Plateau, a 50-mile-long, high-elevation ridge. …according to David Evans, a paleontologist with the Royal Ontario Museum who studies dinosaur diversity in the Late Cretaceous Period, “the area is really our only high resolution window into the time period leading up to and through the extinction of the dinosaurs and into the age of mammals (and) the only place we can study the causes of dinosaur extinction in any detail.”

    He added, “This is really the only place we can study the causes of dinosaur extinction in any detail.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.