High school math kills Trump’s infrastructure plan


Always ready to help a fellow New Yorker

❝ In his address to Congress…President Donald Trump once again brought up his support for a large infrastructure package. And there’s good reason for this: It’s not nearly as polarizing as most other parts of his agenda and would stimulate economic growth in a way that would benefit blue-collar workers who were key to his election. But like much of his agenda, it’s short on details, and the labor-market math doesn’t add up.

❝ Here’s the napkin version. The trillion-dollar package being discussed is understood to be $100 billion of spending per year for 10 years. Leave aside the fact that infrastructure spending is notoriously messy and slow, as environmental delays and other project-specific concerns make it hard to spend the money as fast as a policymaker or economist would like. The labor question alone shows that this vision is impossible.

❝ There are currently 6.8 million construction employees in the U.S. Annualized construction spending in the U.S. at the end of 2016 was $1.18 trillion. Dividing the two, we see that one construction worker supports around $175,000 in construction spending. (This doesn’t mean that construction workers make $175,000 per year — that figure accounts for other labor-supporting projects and building materials.)

One more simple calculation shows the daunting labor needs. If one construction worker can support $175,000 worth of construction projects, then $100 billion in spending each year would require an additional 570,000 construction workers, which doesn’t take into account truck drivers, project managers, environmental specialists, and all other support staff needed to complete projects. Perhaps infrastructure spending, which comprises 25 percent of all construction spending, is a little less labor-intensive than other types of construction spending. Maybe the shrewd administrative talent of this White House could generate some labor efficiencies. That still probably means 400,000 or 500,000 construction workers needed, not 50,000.

❝ How realistic is construction employment growth of 570,000 workers? It hasn’t happened since 1946. Even the peak of the housing bubble generated only one brief year-over-year increase of 500,000 construction workers.

The infrastructure proposal is among Trump’s most politically viable, but economics will kill it.

RTFA for the rest of the gory details. Trump is not only incompetent to develop and lead our nation into a construction project of national importance — he isn’t cunning enough to seek out advice and structural leadership from any of the talent we have in abundance in the GOUSA.

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “High school math kills Trump’s infrastructure plan

  1. List of X says:

    It will add up after half of the $100 billion will line the investors pockets, a quarter will be spent on planning and feasibility studies, and another part spent buying off politicians to vote for this or that project.
    So yeah, 50,000 construction jobs might be enough.

  2. Michelle Meaders says:

    There are lots of unemployed construction workers who could come back. Lots more could be trained by Union apprenticeship programs already in place. But they might expect decent pay and benefits.

    Won’t they just scrap the environmental requirements? And maybe some of the structural engineering ones, too. Pesky regulations! Better to build it again soon. And make lots of jobs fixing people and cars when bridges break.

  3. Johnstown says:

    “America’s Aging Dams Are in Need of Repair” (NYT Feb, 2017) https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/02/23/us/americas-aging-dams-are-in-need-of-repair.html The United States Army Corps of Engineers keeps an inventory of 90,000 dams across the country, and more than 8,000 are classified as major dams by height or storage capacity, according to guidelines established by the United States Geological Survey (see interactive map @ http://nid.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=838:7:0::NO ). By 2020, 70 percent of the dams in the United States will be more than 50 years old, according to the American Society of Civil Engineers. Nearly 2,000 state-regulated high-hazard dams in the United States were listed as being in need of repair in 2015, according to the Association of State Dam Safety Officials. A dam is considered “high hazard” based on the potential for the loss of life as a result of failure.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s