Justice Alito thinks this is a normal equal opportunity voting district
[Texas Republicans spell about as well as they honor the Constitution]
❝ The Supreme Court held on Monday that white lawmakers enjoy a presumption of racial innocence, even when they draw legislative districts that empower white voters at the expense of racial minorities.
The thrust of Justice Samuel Alito’s opinion in Abbott v. Perez is that the “good faith” of a “state legislature must be presumed,” even when there are very serious allegations of racial gerrymandering. The facts of Perez are unusual and unlikely to repeat in the future, but Alito’s presumption of white racial innocence could have a significant impact on future cases…
❝ …Alito’s conclusion is that the 2013 (Texas voting district) maps weren’t enacted to preserve a racial gerrymander; they were enacted to shut down litigation challenging a racial gerrymander. And, somehow, this distinction matters.
Sophistry is only nitpicking as far as racist politics is concerned. There are few discussions and decisions more charged with politics than an unencumbered right to vote. Unencumbered rejects racism and bigotry in most folks’ view of the American Constitution as it stands. Especially considering the Voting Rights Act.