Ever get a warning for driving 5mph BELOW the speed limit?

This video, posted Feb 18, 2020, depicts a black motorist, Ace Perry, being pulled over by a white police officer. The officer says he was suspicious because Perry was traveling 65 mph in a 70 mph zone. The officer, who identifies himself as deputy Snow, issues Perry with a warning but refuses to tell him what the warning is for.

When Perry confronted him after he received a “written warning” for driving under the speed limit, the cop claimed obeying all the traffic laws and not speeding was “suspicious.” He couldn’t even look at Perry in the eye, likely knowing that his job consists of harassing innocent people for no reason.

Bullshit in a blue uniform is still bullshit. Unless you ain’t been looking at the real world, you know racism when you see it.

California traffic stop leads to meth lab at retirement community

Fresno police say they made a routine traffic stop on Robert Short, 64, at Olive and Rowell on Saturday night and found he had meth in his car. Investigators then went to Short’s apartment near Willow and Butler, where they say he was cooking and distributing drugs.

Neighbors who live in the California League-Fresno Village say their retirement community is quiet and safe. So naturally neighbors were appalled to hear one of the tenants is in the Fresno County Jail for dealing and cooking meth in this complex.

“It’s shocking, I would never guess that anything like that would go on at a senior citizen village,” said Robin Schramek.

When Action News knocked on Short’s door, no one answered. But there were signs all over the door that demand privacy and no visitors. Neighbors say despite the tight-knit community there they didn’t know Short, who kept to himself…

When officers pulled Short over it was for a routine traffic stop. Since he’s on supervised release for previous meth sales they searched his car.

“When the officers searched the car they located four ounces of methamphetamine in the car, which is a lot of methamphetamine, so that’s consistent with somebody who’s selling,” said Fresno police Lt. Joe Gomez.

After searching his apartment, they found a half pound of meth, heroin and materials for a meth lab.

“Just shocking someone that age would do that, but actually a perfect place to do it, right? Retirement village, who would suspect it going on there?” said Gomez.

Well, what kind of community do you want to have? I’ll wager it took the coppers who stopped Short only a minute or two to check his priors, to find out he’s on supervised release for previous meth sales.

Don’t want to be surprised about drug dealers in your tight-knit community? Collectively set standards – legal standards – and check folks out before they move in. It’s not uncommon in the best of low-income projects to have rules established about evicting folks convicted of dangerous crimes.

Just don’t get silly and purist about your standards. Folks trying to go straight need all the help they can get.

Playing at being a fake cop? Remember to remove the ganja from your lunch box!

FloriDUH tip: If you’re going to drive around and play fake cop leave your pot at home and maybe change your name — FloriDUH Headquarters doubts if real cops would even have a name like ‘Tippy Iwin Peek.’

When Tippy Iwin Peek was pulled over for an alleged window tinting violation, the 55-year-old Clermont man flashed a badge identifying himself as a “private attorney general” and “bounty hunter.” Peek also reportedly told the deputy he does lawsuits about “law enforcement insurgence” and promptly issued the deputy a phony “warning” citation for “denial of right under color of law,” reports the Orlando Sentinel.

Deputies also said they found pot inside a lunch box in the car, an altered driver’s license and a rotating blue light.

Tippy Iwin, you lose.

You can get the DUHtails at the Orlando Sentinel.

Pregnant woman hogtied and handcuffed by California coppers during traffic stop gets $250,000

A pregnant woman who was pulled over for talking on her cellphone — and then hurled to the ground and hogtied by CHP officers on the shoulder of the busy Harbor Freeway — has been paid $250,000 in damages.

The 30-year-old woman was charged with resisting arrest and driving with a suspended license, but the charges were dropped after a judge was shown a video of the incident, captured on a camera mounted on the dashboard of a California Highway Patrol cruiser.

In their report, the officers said the incident had escalated because the woman had ignored their orders and appeared to raise her arms in an aggressive manner after hopping out of the van.

Based on the report, Gaglione was charged by the Los Angeles city attorney with misdemeanor evading and resisting arrest and driving on a suspended license.

After the charges were dismissed, Tamara Gaglione pleaded no contest to a simple infraction of using her cellphone while driving.

CHP officials declined to discuss the incident, saying only that both sides concluded that settling the lawsuit for $250,000 was in the best interest of everyone.

Gaglione said she discovered the existence of the dashboard video when the officers later drove her to the hospital, discussing it in play-by-play fashion.

Her attorney, Howard Price, said Hernandez failed to mark a box on the arrest report noting the existence of the dash cam video and a prosecutor initially told him none existed. But Price said his client persisted.

Initially, he said, Price got a video from a backup patrol car and was told the dash cam video could not be copied. He said he went to the CHP and videotaped the original recording himself.

For Gaglione, now the mother of a 9-month old son, the incident on the freeway changed her life, she said. She left Los Angeles, where she worked as nanny and ran a pet care business.

“I will always be scared of police officers because of these knuckleheads,” she said.

Dishonest cops. Dishonest prosecutor. Complicit in covering each other’s buns. One of the most typical examples of the kind of corruption that happens on a day-to-day basis in American society.

I holler a lot about the big guys who commit historic crimes – from Bush’s Wars to Rand Paul’s lies about healthcare, economics and civil rights – but, their corruption is established as acceptable by the least of bureaucrats and civil servants who lie and cheat on the job, every day.

And as usual, it’s the knuckleheads who make life difficult for the good guys and the good cops.

Federal Court reinforces standards limiting the use of Tasers


Police officer defending himself from kitty scratch post

In a case that could set the first broad judicial standards for the use of Tasers, a federal appeals court in California has ruled that the police can be held liable for using one of the devices against an unarmed person during a traffic stop.

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, based in San Francisco, said the electrically disabling device constituted excessive force when used against an unarmed man who did not pose a threat, and it refused to allow a police officer immunity for its use.

In a vividly worded opinion issued by the court this week, Judge Kim McLane Wardlaw described a “bad morning” for Carl Bryan, a 21-year-old Californian who drove over large stretches of Southern California to retrieve car keys mistakenly taken by a friend and ended up being Tasered by a Coronado, Calif., policeman and breaking four teeth when he fell to the ground.

Mr. Bryan was stopped twice on his driving odyssey, once for speeding and once for not wearing his seat belt. After the second stop, he was “agitated, standing outside his car, yelling gibberish and hitting his thighs, clad only in his boxer shorts and tennis shoes,” the court said.

The judge noted, however, that Mr. Bryan did not threaten the officer, Brian McPherson, and was not trying to flee — all elements of a three-part test that the United States Supreme Court has used to determine when significant force is justified. As for the third factor in the court’s test, the severity of the offense at issue, the Ninth Circuit judges observed that “traffic violations generally will not support the use of a significant level of force.”

The court found that the policeman’s use of force so exceeded the threat posed by Mr. Bryan that it denied his request for immunity for his actions and for a quick dismissal of the case against him. Instead, the judges will allow the case to go forward.

Ah-hah! Wouldn’t it be nice, once in a while, if our government stepped away from the usual Federalist rationales and actually developed standards for law and jurisprudence – instead of wallowing around for several years, state by state, up through regional jurisdictions – just to establish something as simple as reasonable procedures?

Let the dweebs who refuse standards-based law waste their money on appeals.